Ford Puma vs Skoda Scala – Vilken modell imponerar mest i vardagen?

Ford Puma vs Skoda Scala: Battle of the Compacts

In the ever-evolving world of automotive excellence, compact cars remain an enduring favorite for city dwellers and small families. The Ford Puma and Skoda Scala are two standout offerings in this category, each bringing unique features and innovations to the table. Let's delve into a detailed comparison that weighs their technical aspects and what makes them stand out in the urban jungle.

Design and Body Type

The Ford Puma, characterized as an SUV, presents a bold and sporty profile with a height ranging between 1550 to 1555 mm and a width of 1805 mm. At lengths between 4186 to 4226 mm, the Puma offers a sleek yet spacious design.

On the other hand, the Skoda Scala flaunts a quintessential hatchback style. Measuring 4362 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1514 mm in height, the Scala offers more of a classic, elongated silhouette ideal for both city maneuverability and longer drives.

Engine and Transmission Options

Under the hood, the Ford Puma offers a choice between a Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and a fully electric variant, with power outputs from 125 to 168 HP. The engines are supported by either a manual gearbox, a dual-clutch automatic, or a reduction gearbox for the electric version. This setup offers drivers remarkable flexibility in how they want their driving experience to unfold, supplemented by a front-wheel-drive system.

The Skoda Scala's petrol engine options range from 95 to 150 HP and are available with either a manual or a dual-clutch automatic transmission. It remains firmly in the front-wheel drive camp as well, managing to balance efficiency and performance successfully.

Performance and Efficiency

Ford Puma's engines promise an impressive blend of performance and eco-conscious driving. It boasts a fuel consumption range between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, while the electric variant consumes 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km, with a capable electric range of up to 376 km.

Skoda Scala, meanwhile, promises economical petrol consumption between 5.1 to 5.6 L/100km. With its top speed reaching up to 221 km/h, the Scala caters well to those looking for a slightly racier feel in a compact package.

Interior Comfort and Capacity

Both the Puma and the Scala accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Puma offers a trunk capacity between 456 to 523 liters, potentially making it more versatile for carrying equipment, groceries, or luggage. The Scala stands strong with a 467-liter trunk capacity, balancing utility and comfort effortlessly.

Technological Innovations

Ford has integrated its SUV with the latest infotainment systems, featuring seamless smartphone connectivity and advanced safety technologies. The Puma provides a connected and safe drive with various driver-assistance systems.

Skoda Scala does not lag behind in tech features. It offers a high-definition infotainment system with excellent connectivity, ensuring drivers and passengers have a modern motoring experience with all essential conveniences at their fingertips.

Final Thoughts

In this compact car comparison, both the Ford Puma and Skoda Scala bring a host of impressive features and capabilities to the table. Whether it’s the sporty, flexible drive offered by the Puma or the pragmatic and versatile Scala, potential buyers must weigh their city-driving needs, performance desires, and preference for body style when making a choice.

Ultimately, whether you're choosing the electrified and adventurous route with the Puma or a classic and efficient journey with the Scala, both cars promise to push the boundaries of what compact vehicles can achieve.