MINI Aceman vs Renault R5 – Prestanda, räckvidd & förbrukning jämfört

In the evolving landscape of electric vehicles, two contenders stand out with their stylish designs and impressive specifications—the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5. Both embody the spirit of modernity while prioritizing sustainability. However, as they compete for the attention of eco-conscious consumers, their technical specifications and innovations leave enthusiasts eager for a deeper comparison.

Body Types and Design Philosophy

The MINI Aceman adopts a sporty SUV design, boasting a robust presence complemented by its modern aesthetics. It measures 4079 mm in length, 1754 mm in width, and stands at a height of 1514 mm, creating a versatile and bold profile suited for both city driving and adventurous outings.

In contrast, the Renault R5 embodies the hatchback design, harking back to its iconic predecessors while embracing contemporary styling cues. Smaller yet agile, the R5 measures 3922 mm in length, 1744 mm in width, and reaches a height of 1498 mm, making it an ideal city car that’s easy to maneuver in tight spaces.

Power and Performance

Under the hood, the MINI Aceman offers an electrifying choice of power outputs, ranging from 184 HP to a commanding 258 HP, providing drivers with thrilling acceleration. It achieves a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 seconds, depending on the variant, making it remarkably sprightly for an SUV.

The Renault R5, while slightly less powerful, delivers respectable performance with power outputs from 95 HP to 150 HP. The acceleration ranges from 8 to 9 seconds for the R5, ensuring an exhilarating drive, particularly within urban settings.

Electric Range and Efficiency

Range anxiety is a common concern among electric vehicle owners, but both models excel in efficiency. The MINI Aceman boasts an impressive electric range of up to 405 km, thanks to its dual battery options of 38.5 kWh and 49.2 kWh. With a consumption rate as low as 14.0 kWh/100km, the Aceman is designed for the modern commuter.

The Renault R5 holds its ground with a range of up to 405 km using a 40 kWh battery. However, its consumption rate is slightly higher at 14.8 kWh/100km. While both vehicles prioritize efficiency, the Aceman's enhanced range could be a deciding factor for consumers looking for longer excursions without frequent recharging.

Interior Space and Practicality

Despite being an SUV, the MINI Aceman offers a manageable trunk capacity of 300 liters, suitable for day-to-day shopping or weekend getaways. With seating for five, it ensures ample room for passengers without compromising comfort.

The Renault R5, while having a slightly larger trunk capacity of 326 liters, is designed primarily for urban mobility, making it practical for city dwellers who value space efficiency. Both vehicles can comfortably accommodate five individuals, showcasing versatility in their design philosophies.

Technological Innovations

Modern drivers expect cutting-edge technology, and both the MINI Aceman and Renault R5 come equipped with innovative features. The Aceman offers an intuitive infotainment system with a focus on user experience, seamlessly integrating connectivity options and advanced driver-assistance systems.

The Renault R5 incorporates similar tech advancements, boasting modern connectivity features that appeal to tech-savvy users. It focuses on creating a user-friendly environment that enhances the driving experience, solidifying its status as a forward-thinking hatchback.

Conclusion: A Choice of Style and Purpose

In the battle between the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and cater to different segments of the electric vehicle market. The Aceman stands out with its robust SUV design, higher performance metrics, and superior electric range. Conversely, the R5 provides an iconic hatchback experience, making it ideal for urban environments and those looking for a compact, efficient ride.

Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preferences in style, performance, and intended use. As the automotive world shifts towards electric mobility, both models represent significant steps forward in eco-friendly transportation.