Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 2008 – Prestanda, räckvidd & förbrukning jämfört

Introduction: A Tale of Two Compact SUVs

The automotive market is continuously evolving, with manufacturers vying to create the perfect compact SUV. In this comparison, we delve into the characteristics and technical specifications of two standout contenders: the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008. Each car boasts unique features, strengths, and innovations that cater to diverse consumer preferences. Let’s explore both models in detail.

Design and Dimensions

Both the Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 present striking aesthetics that resonate well with modern consumers. The CX-30 features a length of 4,395 mm, a width of 1,795 mm, and a height of 1,540 mm, giving it a robust and confident stance. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 is slightly smaller, measuring 4,304 mm in length, 1,770 mm in width, and 1,523 mm in height. Despite the dimensional differences, both SUVs provide ample cabin space for five occupants, along with sufficient cargo capacity—430 liters for the CX-30 and 434 liters for the 2008.

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-30 offers a range of petrol mild hybrid engines with outputs of 140 to 186 HP and torque from 238 to 240 Nm. The vehicle can be equipped with either front or all-wheel drive, offering flexibility depending on driving needs. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h ranges from 8.3 seconds to 10.3 seconds, ensuring a sprightly performance for urban driving and highway excursions.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 2008 provides a diverse mix of petrol and electric options. Engine outputs range from 101 HP to a powerful 156 HP, with torque reaching up to 270 Nm. The 0-100 km/h acceleration spans from 8.3 to 10.9 seconds, comparable to its competitor. Notably, the Peugeot offers an electric variant with a range of up to 406 km, showcasing its commitment to electrification, making it a practical choice for eco-conscious buyers.

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel consumption is always a critical consideration for SUV buyers. The Mazda CX-30's figures range from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, which positions it well within its category. The Peugeot 2008, however, edges it out slightly with efficiencies as low as 5.0 L/100km for petrol models, alongside its electric counterpart consuming 15.5 to 15.9 kWh/100km. The Peugeot’s CO2 emissions range from a commendable 0 g/km for the electric version to 129 g/km, which places it highly in terms of eco-friendliness.

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles feature well-designed interiors, promising comfort and style. The Mazda CX-30’s cabin is adorned with high-quality materials and an intuitive MZD Connect system, offering seamless smartphone integration. With a user-friendly infotainment interface and ample safety features including advanced driver assistance systems, it represents Mazda’s commitment to driver-centric design.

The Peugeot 2008 shines with its modern i-Cockpit, which includes a compact steering wheel and a central touchscreen that integrates well with the driver’s line of sight. The Peugeot’s tech offerings also include advanced connectivity options and driver aids that enhance safety and convenience on the road.

Ride and Handling

The driving experience is a crucial factor in choosing an SUV. The Mazda CX-30 is praised for its agile handling and responsive steering, providing a sportier feel compared to its competitors. The all-wheel drive option further enhances stability and control, especially in adverse weather conditions.

Conversely, the Peugeot 2008 delivers a comfortable ride with a more relaxed driving demeanor, focusing on passenger comfort and smooth navigation through urban landscapes. Although sportiness may not be its forte, it compensates with superior ride quality, making it an excellent option for city dwellers.

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

The Mazda CX-30 and the Peugeot 2008 both present compelling cases in the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 offers robust performance and a driver-focused experience, while the 2008 stands out with its electrified options and innovative interior design. Each SUV caters to different consumer needs, whether it be spirited driving or eco-friendly commuting. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual preferences, driving habits, and lifestyle requirements.