Ford Puma vs VW T-Roc – Prestanda, räckvidd & förbrukning jämfört

Dynamic Duo: Comparing the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc

The automotive world is witnessing an intense showdown between two compact SUVs: the Ford Puma and the VW T-Roc. These vehicles, bold in their presence and performance, cater to an audience looking for efficient, versatile, and technologically advanced driving experiences. In this article, we'll delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two popular models.

Power & Performance

The Ford Puma offers a variety of engines, from the efficient 125 HP petrol mild-hybrid to the advanced fully electric version providing up to 160 HP. With a responsive choice of manual or dual-clutch automatic transmissions, the Puma emphasizes versatility. In terms of acceleration, the Puma reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds, offering spirited driving dynamics.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc presents both petrol and diesel engine options. The spectrum ranges from a practical 115 HP petrol variant to a robust 300 HP engine for those who crave greater power. With both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive options available, the T-Roc caters to a wider range of driving preferences. It manages acceleration figures as quick as 4.9 seconds for a sportier drive, particularly in the performance-focused 300 HP variant.

Fuel Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness

Fuel economy plays a pivotal role in the appeal of both models. The Ford Puma's petrol engines boast fuel efficiencies ranging from 5.4 to 6.0 L/100 km, depending on the powertrain. Its electric variant shines with consumption figures as low as 13.1 kWh/100 km and an electric range of up to 376 km, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers.

The VW T-Roc holds its ground with practical fuel consumption figures between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100 km across its petrol and diesel variants. Despite not having an electric version, its efficient diesels make a compelling case for economical, long-distance driving.

Design and Dimensions

In terms of design, both SUVs maintain their respective brand identities. The Ford Puma measures between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, with a width of 1805 mm, and stands about 1555 mm tall. These dimensions contribute to a sportier, compact feel without compromising interior space and comfort.

The VW T-Roc is slightly larger, with lengths varying from 4236 mm to 4271 mm and width around 1819 mm, while height ranges from 1527 mm to 1584 mm, providing a more robust and substantial presence on the road. Both cars offer seating for five, but the T-Roc's slightly larger dimensions grant it a slight edge in trunk capacity, which ranges from 392 to 445 liters compared to Puma’s 456 to 523 liters.

Technological Innovations

Both the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc are laden with technology, enhancing driver convenience and safety. The Puma incorporates Ford's Co-Pilot360, which offers an array of driver-assist technologies. Similarly, VW has packed the T-Roc with its latest tech, including a comprehensive suite of infotainment and connectivity options, ensuring both cars cater to modern tech enthusiasts.

Conclusion

In the clash between the Ford Puma and VW T-Roc, potential buyers have the pleasant dilemma of choosing between exceptional performance, efficiency, and technology. The Ford Puma stands out with its hybrid and electric offerings, appealing to eco-friendly users, while the VW T-Roc's robust engine lineup caters to those who prioritize power and versatility. Ultimately, the decision rests on individual brand loyalty and specific needs, both vehicles representing the pinnacle of compact SUV engineering.